Skip to main content

Week 3: September 23rd


What does it mean to be a 'good' student according to the commonsense?
It is suggested by Kumashiro that a good student follows the ideal 'good', listening, playing, creating as the teacher outlines is acceptable. This can change from each teachers expectation but he gives examples of student who did not follow his, such as, M.

Which students are privileged by this definition of the good student?
Students who follow direction well, and do not question authority or subject matter. These are 'good students', not students who learn 'differently' that traditional education. There are many factors as to why students may not 'sit and behave' in the traditional sense, could be as simple as they are not getting fed a proper breakfast. Therefor only a small group of people are privileged 'good students' by this understanding of a 'good student'.
What is made impossible to see/understand/believe because of these commonsense ideas?
People who are 'good students' may find it difficult to see and understand those who learn differently than the traditional system. They may quickly see these students as 'bad' or troublesome rather than examine, how the student does learn and how and when they best 'behave'. Other teachers may realize the circumstances of a particular student but think that the student needs to adapt to be a good citizen. Rather than, adjusted their classroom so that the student can enjoy learning, subjects, and work with the student so that they can learn methods that work for them. Without examining the students we can quickly come to the commonsense- this student doesnt listen, or follow direction, they are not a good student, they should be disciplined so that they can learn to be a better student. Being a 'good student' often heavily relies on being a 'good teacher' and finding ways to stimulate your students in a way they learn. 
Kumashiro (2010). Against Common Sense, Chapter 2 (pp. 19 – 33) – “Preparing Teachers for Crisis: What It Means to Be a Student”

Comments

  1. UnknownSeptember 30, 2019 at 4:40 PM

    I liked what you said about the many reasons why a student is not succeeding in a classroom. You gave the example of not having eaten a good breakfast. I think this is a relevant point to address in that it is not necessarily just things within the classroom that are preventing students from succeeding. It would be interesting to analyze whether internal or external factors play more of a role in classroom success (while acknowledging both are crucial influences). Both internal and external factors will effect both teacher and student and impact the common sense that they experience in life.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2: September 16/18

Criteria for assignment #1: Outdoor Education and School Curriculum When I first heard about outside school and part-time outside schools, i'll be honest with you I was very hesitant to be on board. While examining this process through the article by Quay, j. (2016), it really gave me a new perspective and here I stand now defending that outside education absolutely needs to be a subject and is very important to all subject matters and is a key component in subjects and also of self. Some may argue that outdoor education is an alternative but throughout the assignment I will be doing I plan to argue that outdoor education is a subject and key part of other subject. Quay put forward that outdoor education " introduces the idea that education involves more than just curriculum and pedagogy, for it is ontological, about being, about who we are in the world, about who we have been and can be.  We need to see this deeper layer of ways of being, for it is in a living, experient
5 comments
Read more

Learning from Place

This week we read an article which was written by Jean P. Restoule, Sheila Gruner, and Edmund Metatawabin titled “Learning from Place: A Return to Traditional Mushkegowuk Ways of Knowing” speaks of the processes decolonization and re-inhabitation, especially in the context of land.  How do people live on land? How did people ever figure out to live on the land for example of Saskatchewan? Beats me, its so cold out there! But people did, but then colonizers took a lot of that knowledge away from the people and so now how did they get back to it and re-inhabitate what was their land and way of life? One way discussed in this article is to bring people together “bringing generations of community members together on the land led to the  reclamation of culture  and Indigenous knowledge and built greater community resistance to external forms of  economic exploitation  and development” (68) By standing together they become a larger body and an empowered body. After generations of b
Post a Comment
Read more