Skip to main content

Learning from Place



This week we read an article which was written by Jean P. Restoule, Sheila Gruner, and Edmund Metatawabin titled “Learning from Place: A Return to Traditional Mushkegowuk Ways of Knowing” speaks of the processes decolonization and re-inhabitation, especially in the context of land. 
How do people live on land? How did people ever figure out to live on the land for example of Saskatchewan? Beats me, its so cold out there! But people did, but then colonizers took a lot of that knowledge away from the people and so now how did they get back to it and re-inhabitate what was their land and way of life?
One way discussed in this article is to bring people together “bringing generations of community members together on the land led to the reclamation of culture and Indigenous knowledge and built greater community resistance to external forms of economic exploitation and development” (68) By standing together they become a larger body and an empowered body. After generations of being told their way of living is wrong this is a way to have people each other what is right and confirm it with one another and have a stronger voice to be recognized. 
Decolonization cab be seen as an act of resistance rather than a reclamation of culture and integrating it within society today.  “decolonization as an act of resistance must not be limited to rejecting and transforming dominant ideas; it also depends on recovering and renewing traditional, non-commodified cultural patterns such as mentoring and inter-generational relationships” (Restoule et al. 74). To think we need to completely change society today is a bogus idea but yet some people view reclamation as just that.  
When putting the place in teaching I think this needs to be done for not just First Nations and Indigenous peoples but for all people who have been marginalized by the 'west'. The curriculum for grade 10-12, for example, is very outdates with doing the curriculum critique it made it clear to me that there is problem in the curriculum of our school, hidden and null and formally written curriculum in regards to newcomer students.  Immigrant students often have viewed social studies, which often silences the histories of non-European regions and reinforces narrowly-defined national citizenship, as meaningless and irrelevant to their lives. I think we need to talk a lot more about place and think about place when teaching. Recognize who's place is this we are teaching now. What land are we on? Who has lived on this land? Who is now living on this land how did they get here? What was the place this person is from? Place is so relevant. By acknowledging place, in all of these contexts when teaching, students will become empowered and they too will have a better understanding of place, their place and our place. This will allow space for students to be proud and know their place and also everyone's place 

Restoule, Jean-Paul, et al. “Learning from Place: A Return to Traditional Mushkegowuk Ways of Knowing”. Canadian Journal of Education, vol. 36, no. 2, 2013, pp. 68-86.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2: September 16/18

Criteria for assignment #1: Outdoor Education and School Curriculum When I first heard about outside school and part-time outside schools, i'll be honest with you I was very hesitant to be on board. While examining this process through the article by Quay, j. (2016), it really gave me a new perspective and here I stand now defending that outside education absolutely needs to be a subject and is very important to all subject matters and is a key component in subjects and also of self. Some may argue that outdoor education is an alternative but throughout the assignment I will be doing I plan to argue that outdoor education is a subject and key part of other subject. Quay put forward that outdoor education " introduces the idea that education involves more than just curriculum and pedagogy, for it is ontological, about being, about who we are in the world, about who we have been and can be.  We need to see this deeper layer of ways of being, for it is in a living, experient

Week 3: September 23rd

What does it mean to be a 'good' student according to the commonsense? It is suggested by Kumashiro that a good student follows the ideal 'good', listening, playing, creating as the teacher outlines is acceptable. This can change from each teachers expectation but he gives examples of student who did not follow his, such as, M. Which students are privileged by this definition of the good student? Students who follow direction well, and do not question authority or subject matter. These are 'good students', not students who learn 'differently' that traditional education. There are many factors as to why students may not 'sit and behave' in the traditional sense, could be as simple as they are not getting fed a proper breakfast. Therefor only a small group of people are privileged 'good students' by this understanding of a 'good student'. What is made impossible to see/understand/believe because of these commonsense